Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Huge task for jurors in the Apple vs Samsung lawsuit

Apple vs Samsung lawsuitJurors in the Apple versus Samsung patent trial, taking place in a federal court in San Jose, California, will have to answer over 600 questions, in the very elaborate 20-page verdict, according to Bloomberg. The two companies have filed dozens of evidence on record, which includes 50 hours of pleading and evidence and complex calculations on the potential damage of billions of dollars.

The judge read the jury 109 pages of instructions needed to properly respond over 600 questions that must be answered for the verdict. Reading of the rules took more than two hours, as there were several “standing breaks” to ensure that jurors will pay attention.

The 600 questions concern three different categories of patents, each governed by a different set of rules: utility patents, design patents, and intellectual property rights for the “appearance” of products. Thus, the jury must first categorize each question in one of these groups, then reach a verdict by applying specific regulations and deliberations. The jury began deliberations Wednesday and the verdict must be unanimous for the lawsuit to result in a winner.

The lawsuit began in April 2011 when Apple accused Samsung that some Galaxy smartphones and tablets manufactured by South Korean are copies of the iPhone and iPad. The South Korean company counterattacked accusing Apple that it uses several patented telecommunication technologies held by Samsung. The two companies, which dominate the smartphone market, sued each other in similar lawsuits in 30 countries on four continents, as the federal court confrontation in San Jose was the first to get in front of a jury and is close to being resolved.

Apple wants damages up to $2.75 billion and called the judge to impose the temporary ban on sale of Samsung tablet in the U.S. to become permanent, in which case the company may require extending the ban to other products, including smartphones. Apple claims that over 28 Samsung products infringe intellectual property rights, and the jurors have to decide which companies of the South Korean group – the parent company or the two divisions in the United States – would be responsible for charges. The damage must be determined individually for each product found “guilty” and each infringed patent.

Samsung claims that Apple has violated five of the South Korean company’s patents and requested royalties of $421.8 million.

Reply